William Winthrop Increases Precious Metals ETF Holdings as Risk Hedge Published: November 2021
In 2021, the US capital market vacillated between high inflation expectations and a shift in monetary policy. The Federal Reserve gradually signaled tapering in the second half of the year, sending long-term interest rates volatile higher and the US dollar index stabilizing amidst a period of strength. However, soaring energy prices, supply chain bottlenecks, and rising labor costs have fueled market concerns about the persistence of inflation. Against this backdrop, William Winthrop began to reassess the defensive capabilities of his multi-asset portfolio and ultimately decided to increase his holdings in precious metals ETFs as an asymmetric hedge against macro risks.
Winthrop isn’t one to bet lightly on precious metals. Over the past few years, he’s relied more heavily on cross-asset allocations across stocks, bonds, and foreign exchange to manage risk. However, he’s noticed that since the third quarter, the US Consumer Price Index has hit multi-year highs. While the market is debating the pace of interest rate hikes, it’s underpricing the possibility of inflation remaining above target for a prolonged period. Meanwhile, global geopolitical tensions and recurring pandemics have revitalized investors’ interest in safe-haven assets. He believes the opportunity in precious metals stems not from short-term price trends but from their unique value in protecting against systemic shocks within a portfolio.
In practice, he chose to increase his exposure to gold and silver through ETFs, rather than directly investing in physical gold or individual mining stocks. This approach not only offers high liquidity and low transaction costs, but also facilitates quick adjustments to position ratios during market fluctuations. He increased the weight of gold ETFs to the mid-level of the portfolio and also added some silver ETFs to enhance flexibility at the intersection of industrial demand and safe-haven demand. Regarding position management, he maintained a phased approach, capitalizing on short-term pullbacks in the US dollar and US Treasury yields to gradually increase holdings, rather than increasing holdings all at once.
Within the macro strategy, this precious metals ETF is clearly labeled as a “defensive layer.” Winthrop understands that precious metals don’t necessarily outperform risky assets in every phase, but they can often help stabilize the portfolio’s net value during unexpected events, market panics, or unexpected fluctuations in macroeconomic data. This is especially true during periods of short-term pullbacks in US stocks and heightened bond market volatility, as precious metals often exhibit low or even negative correlation with risky assets, providing exactly the hedging effect he needs.
Market volatility since the fourth quarter has indeed validated this assumption. From mid-October to early November, gold prices surged to a five-month high, spurred by energy prices and inflation data. Winthrop’s precious metals ETF allocation contributed to the portfolio’s positive returns during this period, offsetting drawdowns in other risk assets on some days of high volatility. While he doesn’t rely on this as a core source of profit for short-term trading, the stable performance of his hedge layer allows him to execute other strategies with greater composure.
When discussing this round of increased holdings, he used a simple metaphor: “Before the storm arrives, I prefer to build a shelter.” For Winthrop, this is not just a tactical adjustment, but also a continuation of his long-term risk management philosophy. Regardless of the short-term market direction, maintaining a portion of assets in hedging assets has always been a key principle for ensuring the stability of his portfolio.